ombinations and associations

ddress, in observance of his birthday. In it, he ecause there’s now a story where there should not have been one — certain people in the Bernie camp wanted to take advantage of it — the unions that tắm trắng da ở đâu tốt endorsed Hillary want to make really clear to people that we are incredibly supportive of her.” The A.F.L.-C.I.O. endorsed Vice President Al Gore in October 1999, shortly before he competed against former Senator Bill Bradley in the 2000 Democratic primaries. It endorsed Senator John Kerry in February 2004, after Mr. Kerry had piled up victories in more than a dozen contests, including the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, and appeared on his way to the nomination though he still faced a challenge from Senator John Edwards. (Mr. Edwards finished unexpectedly close to Mr. Kerry in the Wisconsin primary shortly before the federation’s endorsement that year.) In 2008, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. did not endorse a Democratic candidate out of fear that pushing forward with a vote could be divisive. Others worried that a vote could divide the labor movement more broadly. “I do believe it would not be beneficial to push the issue,” said Lee Saunders, president of the 1.6-million member American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, or Afscme, which has also endorsed Mrs. Clinton and was part of the joint statement. “Everyone will have to come together when there’s a Democratic candidate.” In truth, both nâng mũi an toàn sides have evidence to back up their claims about the state of the race among union voters. Mrs. Clinton has the endorsement of 23 unions, versus three for Mr. Sanders, and the unions that tam trang an toan cho da have endorsed her represent more members than all the unions in the A.F.L.-C.I.O. (S — Barack Obama — until June, by which point Mr. Obama had already effectively laments the rise of factions and political parties as a threat to the new government’s ability to get things done. “All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this ecretary Clinton has proven herself as the fighter and champion working people and their families need in the White House,” says the statement, which was embraced by several large unions, including the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, the American Federation of Teachers, and the Service Employees International Union. “That is why, of all unions endorsing a candidate in the Democratic primary, the vast majority of the membership in these unions has endorsed her.” The statement is partly a reaction to the aftermath of the announcement by the A.F.L.-C.I.O., a federation of unions, that it would not vote during its executive council meeting this week on whether to endorse a candidate in the Democratic presidential primaries, essentially postponing an endorsement until the primaries are no longer competitive. “I have concluded that there is nang mui an toan o dau broad consensus for the A.F.L.-C.I.O. to remain neutral in the presidential primaries for the time being,” Richard L. Trumka, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. president, said in an tam trang an toan chat luong email to union officials last week. Supporters of Mr. Sanders argued that the decision not to hold an endorsement vote reflected substantial enthusiasm for him among rank and file union voters, even within unions that had already endorsed Mrs. Clinton. “I would say over all that union nâng mũi uy tín members are divided,” said Larry Cohen, a senior adviser to Mr. Sanders and past president of the Communications Workers of America. “It’s significant given where we were fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency,” Washington wrote. “They serve to organize